Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Friedman
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided March 14, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
An interesting variation from the usual routine objection to the grant of an application to compel an accounting is encountered in the present case. The diligence of counsel has failed to disclose that the basic issue has ever previously been presented to a Surrogate’s Court in this State for determination, and the independent research of the court has uncovered only a single possibly pertinent precedent in this tribunal.
As established by the allegations of the pleadings, which must be accepted as true by reason of the submission of the issue for decision on these documents alone…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Schermerhorn v. . TalmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
- People Ex Rel. Sheldon v. . Board of AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Stevens v. Central National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- In re the Estate of ShupackNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
- In re the Estate of HearnNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Estate of McCormickNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- World Athletic Sports Corp. v. PahlaviDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- In re the Estate of ChambersNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- Associated Sales Analysts, Inc. v. WeitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- Prudential Oil Corp. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981