Legal Opinion
United States v. Starr
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided July 5, 1927No. 2586PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Circuit Judge.
Starr & Bennett, hereinafter called contractors, on February 27, 1919, entered into a contract with the Director General of Railroads of the United States for the construction of four steel barges, and gave bond, with the Globe Indemnity Company as surety, for the faithful performance of the contract. This is an action instituted on the bond by Stallings Bros., as relators, to recover for materials furnished to the contractors. Sundry other furnishers of materials have intervened and been made parties to the action. In the court below a jury trial was duly waived by…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Illinois Surety Co. v. United States Ex Rel. PeelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Brick Co. v. . GentrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Edward P. Fourniquet and Wife, and Martin W. Ewing and Wife v. John PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Gas & Electric Securities Co. v. Manhattan & Queens Traction Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- Ideal Brick Co. v. GentrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. FowlerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
- Paul Schoonover, Inc. v. Ram Construction Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
- United States v. D'ArgentoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1964
- Sun Insurance Co. of New York v. Diversified Engineers, Inc.District Court, D. Montana · 1965
- Webster Motor Car Co. v. Zell Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.