Ideal Brick Co. v. Gentry
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
The office of a demurrer is to determine the sufficiency of a pleading, admitting, for the purpose, the truth of the allegations of fact contained therein. Whitehead v. Tel. Co., 190 N. C., 197; Davies v. Blomberg, 185 N. C., 496.
The plaintiffs allege in their complaint that L. Gentry, a contractor, entered into a written agreement with the Board of Education of Cumberland County 11 July* 1922, for the erection of a school building at Linden, N. C., in which it was stipulated, among other things, that “the contractor .shall provide and pay for all materials, labor, water, tools, equipment,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Gorrell v. Greensboro Water Supply Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Sharrow v. . Inland Lines, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Morganton Manufacturing & Trading Co. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Town of Gastonia v. McEntee-Peterson Engineering Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- Bennett v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Knox Recr. v. BallTexas Supreme Court · 1945
- Gaines v. Long Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- McDowell v. Blythe Bros. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. FowlerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
- Shives v. SampleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.