Legal Opinion

Bank One Chicago, N. A. v. Midwest Bank & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 17, 1996No. 94-1175PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ginsburg

This case concerns the Expedited Funds Availability Act, 12 U. S. C. §§4001-4010, a 1987 law designed to accelerate the availability of funds to bank depositors and to improve the Nation’s check payment system. We confront a jurisdictional question regarding the Act’s civil liability provisions, in particular §§ 4010(a), (d), and (f): Is federal-court subject-matter jurisdiction under those provisions confined to suits initiated by bank customers against banks, as the Court of Appeals held, or do federal courts have jurisdiction, as well, over suits brought by one bank against another…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. American Airlines, Inc. v. WolensSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Coit Independence Joint Venture v. Federal Savings & Loan InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. First Illinois Bank & Trust, an Illinois Banking Corporation v. Midwest Bank & Trust Company, an Illinois Banking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  4. United Postal Savings Ass'n v. Royal Bank Mid-CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Carter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Texas v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  4. Federal Lands Legal Consortium v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  5. Hartford Fire Insurance v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API