Legal Opinion

Thomason v. McIntyre

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1923No. 3726PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greenwood

Defendants in error sued plaintiff in error G. J. Thomason to cancel a conveyance of minerals and appurtenant rights, executed by defendants in error to said plaintiff in error. One of the alleged grounds of cancellation was fraud on the part of said plaintiff in error in procuring the execution of the conveyance. Plaintiffs in error, G. W. Thomason and Y. L. Thomason, intervened asserting an interest under G. J. Thomason. Plaintiff in error G. J. Thomason, besides other matters, plead limitations of two and four years. In response to special issues, the jury made many findings against…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chicago, Texas & Mexican Central Railway Co. v. TitteringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. The Texas Company v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Gordon v. Rhodes & DanielTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Moore v. ChamberlainTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Clark v. Texas Co-op. Inv. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Waggoner Estate v. Sigler Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Williams v. KhalafTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Bookhout v. McGeorgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Stroud v. PechacekCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Woods v. BostCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API