Legal Opinion

Nekoosa-Edwards Paper Co. v. Railroad Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed May 3, 1927:

Rosenberry, J.

The proposed tariffs, after the caption, were in substantially the same form. That tendered by the Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company is as follows:

“Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company.
“Allowance for terminal switching at Wisconsin Rapids, Wis.
“On all carload revenue shipments, including trap cars containing 6,000 pounds or more of less carload revenue freight, destined to or coming from the plant of the Consolidated Water Power & Paper Company, the terminal switching service is performed by the Consolidated Water Power & Paper…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co. v. . General El. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. General Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. State ex rel. Knight v. CaveMontana Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Monroe v. Railroad CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States Jaycees v. McClureSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. People Ex Rel. Schlaeger v. Bunge Bros. Coal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Nekoosa-Edwards Paper Co. v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Extendicare, Inc. v. State of Kansas Coordinating Council for Health PlanningSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  5. Opinion No. Oag 22-80, (1980), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API