Legal Opinion
Nekoosa-Edwards Paper Co. v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided March 5, 1935PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
A railroad and a shipper may lawfully enter into a contract under which the railroad is to pay rent for any facilities incident to transportation of property owned by the shipper and used by the railroad. The section of the statutes applicable is sec. 195.11 (2) and it reads:
“It shall be unlawful for any railroad to demand, charge, collect or receive from any shipper a less compensation for the transportation of property or for any service rendered or to be rendered by said railroad, in consideration of said shipper furnishing any part of the facilities incident thereto; but any railroad may…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nolan v. Milwaukee, Lake Shore & Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- Nekoosa-Edwards Paper Co. v. Railroad CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Nekoosa-Edwards Paper Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hartford Electric Light Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- People Ex Rel. Schlaeger v. Bunge Bros. Coal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1945
- Mashak v. PoelkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. MinerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1956
- Bernardine v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.