Legal Opinion

Nay v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 27, 1925No. Docket No. 2993PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

This matter is before the court upon petitioner’s application for a writ of mandate, commanding the Superior Court of Napa County and Honorable Percy S. King, as judge thereof, to vacate an order dismissing an appeal by the petitioner taken by him from a judgment entered in the justice’s court of Hot Springs township, in the county of Napa, wherein L. S. Mitchell was plaintiff and N. R. Fowler and the petitioner, H. L. Nay, were defendants.

The facts, as they appear in the pleadings, so far as necessary to be considered in the determination of petitioner’s application, are as follows: On the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mallory v. SeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Hughes v. De MundCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Timmons v. CoonleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  4. Fighiera v. DewhirstCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Golden v. Stansbuby, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API