Fighiera v. Dewhirst
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandamus originally made to the District Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District to compel the settlement of a bill of exceptions. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
This is a proceeding in mandamus to require the respondent, as judge of the superior court in and for the county of San Bernardino, to settle a bill of exceptions in an action wherein the petitioners were plaintiffs and one William F. Radis was defendant. After the entry of judgment in that action the plaintiffs in due time served and filed their notice of intention to move for a new trial, and-later served and filed notice that said motion would be made ■ on the nineteenth day of June, at 2 o’clock P. M. At that time, the attorney for plaintiffs not appearing and the attorney for defendant'…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mallory v. SeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Hughes Manufacturing & Lumber Co. v. ElliottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Vatcher v. WilburCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hughes v. De MundCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Nay v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925