Mason v. Ennes
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
O’DONNELL, J. pro tem. *
Plaintiff, as lessor, and defendant, as lessee, executed a written lease which contained the following provisions: “Lessee is hereby authorized to build approximately 30 ft. x 70 ft. upon the demised premises for the use of his business and to also construct such other improvements thereon as may be necessary or convenient for him in conducting said business. With reference to the 30 ft. x 70 ft. building to be so erected, Lessee does hereby covenant and agree to so construct the same, work thereon to commence within a reasonable time after the execution of this lease.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- De Burgh v. De BurghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Bettancourt v. Gilroy Theatre Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Bertone v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
3Cited by12 opinions
- Auer v. FrankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Robinson & Wilson, Inc. v. StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- S. Jon Kreedman v. MEYERS BROS. PARKING-WESTERNCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Coronet Credit Corp. v. West Thrift Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Branche v. HetzelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.