Legal Opinion

Smith v. Cottrell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1884No. 10,637PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Warrick Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bicknell, C. C.

The appellee filed a complaint to foreclose a mortgage executed to him by the appellant Brandsasse and his wife to secure the promissory note of Brandsasse. The appellant Smith was made a (defendant to answer as to his interest.

Brandsasse was defaulted; the suit was abated as to his wife by her death. Smith answered, alleging that he,- as owner of the land in dispute, brought an action of ejectment against Brandsasse, in which he was 'defeated; that after-wards Brandsasse and wife gave plaintiff the mortgage now in suit, which the plaintiff received with full knowledge of said…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Murray v. BallouNew York Court of Chancery · 1815

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pond v. McNellisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Di Nola v. AllisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Attica Building & Loan Ass'n v. ColvertIndiana Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Dunnington v. ElstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Hoosier Construction Co. v. SeibertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API