Legal Opinion

Tyr Sport, Inc. v. Warnaco Swimwear, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided May 3, 2010No. Case No.: SACV 08-529 JVS(MLGx)Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND RECONSIDERATION

JAMES Y. SELNA, District Judge.

Defendant Warnaco Swimwear, Inc. dba Speedo USA (“Speedo”) moves for for summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 on the remaining claims for relief asserted against it by Plaintiff TYR Sport, Inc. (“TYR”). Defendants United States Swimming, Inc. (“USA Swimming”) and Mark Schubert (“Schubert”) also move for summary judgment under Rule 56 on TYR’s remaining claims. Speedo and USA Swimming and Schubert (collectively, “Defendants”) join each others’ respective motions. TYR opposes both…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API