Legal Opinion

Sage v. Sage

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1925No. Docket No. 109PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, C. J.

This bill is filed to set aside a deed. The parties are all surviving children of Patrick Sage and Ellen Sage, except Marie Sage Drolet, who is a grandchild. The defendants Lawrence Sage and Joseph Sage have the same interest in the controversy as the plaintiffs. As they did not join with them in instituting the suit they were included as defendants, so that all of the parties in interest should be before the court. Patrick Sage and Ellen Sage owned certain property by the entireties. They executed the following joint and mutual last will and testament on the 15th of April, 1918:

“Be it…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Church of Christ Home for Aged, Inc. v. Nashville Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Eicholtz v. GrunewaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Daniels v. BridgesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Guzorek v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Levi v. MurrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API