Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Cody

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1936No. Docket No. 60, Calendar No. 39,063PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtToy, J.

Appellants, some 30 in number, appeal, by leave of this court, from an order entered by the circuit court denying their motion to dismiss plaintiff’s bill of complaint.

Plaintiff filed its bill of complaint in the nature of interpleader, alleging that it was surety on two bonds, given by Norman Berry & Company, a stock brokerage concern of Detroit (now bankrupt), in the penal sum of $10,000 each; that the first bond was executed on April 13, 1935, and contained the following condition:

“Now, therefore, the condition of this obligation is such that if the said Norman Berry & Company and all…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Guffanti v. . National Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
  2. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. HydeOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  3. National Surety Co. v. GravesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Witter v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  5. Melton v. American Surety Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Welch v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  2. Northline Excavating, Inc. v. Livingston CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API