Legal Opinion
Hammons v. Grant
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided May 1, 1924No. Civil No. 2282PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
— It appears that on the date of taking over the Citizens’ Bank & Trust Company, August 27, 1923, by the superintendent of banks, the bank held Grant Bros.’ promissory note, upon which was due a balance of $720.62, and that there was on deposit in said bank, subject to the general checking account of Grant Bros., $1,331.42.
The superintendent of banks, acting under the Banking Code (chapter 31, Acts Special Session of the Fifth Legislature 1922), took charge of the property and business of the Citizens’ Bank & Trust Company as a failing and insolvent institution, and thereafter brought this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Scott v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Colton v. Drovers' Perpetual Building & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
- Funk v. YoungSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
- Upham v. BramwellOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- In Re the General Assignment of HatchNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wehby v. SpurwayArizona Supreme Court · 1926
- Brown v. PorterIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
- Gonzalez & Co., Brokers, Inc. v. ThomasArizona Supreme Court · 1933
- United States v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Arizona Corp. Commission v. California InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.