Legal Opinion

Sudds v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided June 29, 2004No. 14-02-01241-CRPublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAJORITY OPINION

KEM THOMPSON FROST, Justice.

This case presents an interesting and unsettled issue regarding the proper standard of review for evaluating a criminal defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting a venue determination. Appellant Patrick Sudds, who was convicted on four counts of sexual assault of a child, contends the evidence was legally and factually insufficient to prove venue in Harris County for trial court cause numbers 908118 and 908119. He also claims his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance during the punishment phase of trial. We affirm.

I.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  4. Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  5. Bone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Dale Fulmer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2013
  2. Thierry v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009
  3. Bollinger v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2007
  4. Witt v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2007
  5. Abel Reyna v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2005

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API