Karlson v. City of Oklahoma City
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLIN, Vice Chief Justice.
This matter turns on the issue of whether an injured party, as plaintiff, in a negligence action against a municipality, is “legally entitled to recover” damages in excess of the limits of liability imposed by the Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act, as that phrase is used in the statutes governing underinsured motorist insurance coverage.
We hold the insured party is so entitled.
The factual background which gave rise to this issue is as follows: the plaintiffs sued the City of Oklahoma City for damages for injuries and wrongful death arising out of an automobile…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Uptegraft v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Aetna Insurance Company v. ZoblotskySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
- Lester v. SparksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Tipton v. PikeDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1982
3Cited by42 opinions
- Kmonk-Sullivan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Silvers v. Horace Mann InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Torres v. Kansas City Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- West American Insurance v. PopaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. v. GreerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.