Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Kane

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 15, 1902PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Proceedings by the trustee in bankruptcy of Pierce D. Kane, deceased, to compel James H. Kane, as surviving administrator of Francis Kane, deceased, to account and pay certain moneys, alleged to be in his hands, to said trustee.

1Opinion of the Court

Heaton, S.

On the 4th day of October, 1901, Henry A. Conway, as trustee in bankruptcy of Pierce D. Kane, deceased, filed in this court a petition, praying that James H. Kane, as surviving administrator of the estate of Francis Kane, deceased, might be ordered to render his account as such administrator, and pay to such trustee about $7,000 alleged to be in his hands. Thereafter, and on the 24th day of December, 1901, such administrator filed his petition for judicial settlement of his accounts in compliance with an order of this court, together with an account of his proceedings, and citation…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wyman v. . WymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  2. Shumway v. CooperNew York Supreme Court · 1853
  3. In re SpearsNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Lawrence v. Niagara Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  5. Matthews v. American Central InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of HilpertNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  2. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Estate of SergantNew York Surrogate's Court · 1909
  3. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Estate of RobertsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API