Legal Opinion
Dziedzina v. Dolphin Tanker Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 5, 1962No. 29540PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
KRAFT, District Judge.
The plaintiff objects to all of the interrogatories directed to him by the third-party defendant, Atlantic Port Contractors, Inc., on the ground that they are not directed to an “adverse party” within the meaning of Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.
Plaintiff, a boilermaker employed by the third-party defendant, instituted this action against the defendants to recover damages for personal injuries which he alleges he sustained while he was aboard the S.S. “Edward L. Steiniger”, a vessel allegedly owned and operated by defendants. He contends that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- M.V.M., Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Cooke v. Kilgore Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1954
- Kestner v. Reading Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
- Harlan Produce Co. v. Delaware, L. & W. R.District Court, W.D. New York · 1948
- Harris v. Marine Transport Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Carey v. SchuldtDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1957