Legal Opinion
Bishop v. Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided January 10, 2008No. 25,510PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALARID, Judge.
{1} Plaintiffs’ motion for rehearing having been granted, the Court’s opinion of September 4, 2007, is withdrawn and this opinion substituted in its place.
{2} This appeal requires us to construe and apply the Continuing Care Act. The Legislature enacted the Continuing Care Act (CCA) in 1985. 1985 N.M. Laws, ch. 102 (codified at NMSA 1978, §§ 24-17-1 to -13 (1985, as amended through 2005)). In enacting the CCA, the Legislature declared that “continuing care communities are an important and growing alternative for the provision of long-term residential, social and health…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Property Owners Assn. of N. Bergen v. Tp. of N. BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- PNM Gas Services v. New Mexico Public Utility CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Corporation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bishop v. Evangelical Good Samaritan SocietyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- Bishop v. EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN SOC.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
- Bishop v. Evangelical LutheranNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010