Legal Opinion
Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Corporation Commission
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided October 22, 1982No. 13881PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
In January 1981, Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company (Mountain Bell) filed an application for a rate increase of $48.3 million, based on a 1981 test year. The Attorney General of New Mexico (Attorney General) moved to intervene in the proceedings on behalf of the State and all New Mexico customers of Mountain Bell not otherwise represented. The State Corporation Commission (Commission) granted the Attorney General’s motion. In July the Commission entered its final order authorizing an increase in rates of $27,236 million. Mountain Bell’s petition for reconsideration was…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by30 opinions
- Albuquerque Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority v. New Mexico Public Regulation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- US West Communications, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- U.S. West Inc. v. TristaniCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- In Re Com'n InvestigationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.