Legal Opinion

Ciric v. Flanigen

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 20, 1975No. Patent Appeal No. 74-604PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Judge.

This is an appeal by senior party-appellant from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences 1 awarding priority to junior party-appellees on the basis of their actual reduction to practice prior to appellant’s earliest filing date. The only element of the actual reduction to practice challenged by appellant is utility. We affirm.

The interference involves novel synthetic crystalline zeolites described in a *1183count2 which does not specify any particular use. Consideration of the sole issue before us involves the properties of the known class of crystalline zeolites and the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brenner v. MansonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Frederick F. Blicke v. Gino R. TrevesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  3. Silvestri v. GrantCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  4. Rey-Bellet v. EngelhardtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  5. Application of Karl Folkers and Clifford H. ShunkCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Laszlo Marosi, Joachim Stabenow, and Matthias SchwarzmannCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  2. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. United States Steel Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1987
  3. Standard Oil Company v. MontedisonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980
  4. Standard Oil Co. v. Montedison, S.p.A.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  5. Standard Oil Company (Indiana) v. MontedisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API