Legal Opinion
Murphy-Holman v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 30, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2025-0732Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MURPHY-HOLMAN, Plaintiff, v. No. 25-cv-00732-ZMF WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendants. ORDER Before the Court is Defendant Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority’s (“WMATA”) Motion for Summary Judgment. See Mot. Summ. J., ECF No. 13. For the reasons stated below, WMATA’s Motion is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND On October 23rd, 2024, Plaintiff, a 61-year-old woman boarded a WMATA bus. See Mot. Summ. J., Dep. of Jaquline Murphy-Holmon 23:2–7, ECF No. 13-3. Plaintiff testified that…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.