Legal Opinion

LE

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 2011No. ID 3719PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

25 I&N Dec. 541

(BIA 2011) Interim Decision #3719 Matter of Hieu Trung LE, Respondent Decided June 23, 2011 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals A derivative child of a nonimmigrant fiancé(e) visa holder under section 101(a)(15)(K)(iii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(15)(K)(iii) (2006), is not ineligible for adjustment of status simply by virtue of having turned 21 after admission to the United States on a K-2 nonimmigrant visa. FOR RESPONDENT: Lisa H. York, Esquire, Denver, Colorado FOR THE…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Lindahl v. Office of Personnel ManagementSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. Reymundo Martinez-CarilloCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  5. Carpio v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Si Min Cen v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  2. Noel Regis v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  3. VALENZUELABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2012
  4. AKRAMBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2012
  5. Mahvash Akram v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API