Legal Opinion

Mahvash Akram v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 9, 2013No. 12-3008PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KANNE, Circuit Judge.

The Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), Pub.L. 82-414, 66 Stat. 163, as amended, 8 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq., is a bit of a beast. It is not known for being warm or cuddly; words like “intricate” and “Byzantine” come more readily to mind. Zeqiri v. Mukasey, 529 F.3d 364, 370 (7th Cir.2008). Nor is it known for being easy to understand; we have often remarked on its fiendish complexity. See, e.g., O’Sullivan v. USCIS, 453 F.3d 809, 812 (7th Cir.2006); Muhur v. Ashcroft, 382 F.3d 653, 656 (7th Cir.2004); Asani v. INS, 154 F.3d 719, 727 (7th Cir.1998). But even the INA has…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Camreta v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Si Min Cen v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  2. Hong Liu Yang v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API