Mahvash Akram v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KANNE, Circuit Judge.
The Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), Pub.L. 82-414, 66 Stat. 163, as amended, 8 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq., is a bit of a beast. It is not known for being warm or cuddly; words like “intricate” and “Byzantine” come more readily to mind. Zeqiri v. Mukasey, 529 F.3d 364, 370 (7th Cir.2008). Nor is it known for being easy to understand; we have often remarked on its fiendish complexity. See, e.g., O’Sullivan v. USCIS, 453 F.3d 809, 812 (7th Cir.2006); Muhur v. Ashcroft, 382 F.3d 653, 656 (7th Cir.2004); Asani v. INS, 154 F.3d 719, 727 (7th Cir.1998). But even the INA has…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Camreta v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Si Min Cen v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Hong Liu Yang v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015