Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1890No. 15,549PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Grant Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBerkshire, C. J.

— This action has for its foundation a recognizance executed by the appellants to the appellee to secure Baldwin’s attendance in the Blackford Circuit Court to answer for contempt. The circumstances, in brief, are as follows :

*26Baldwin had been subpoenaed to appear as a witness before the grand jury of the Blackford Circuit Court, at its March term, 1888; he failed to appear; the court ordered an attachment, and fixed the bail at $100. The writ was issued, directed to the sheriff of Grant county, who executed it and approved the recognizance sued upon. Baldwin failing to appear in answer to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1822
  2. New Orleans v. Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Hawkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Carter v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1899
  2. State Ex Rel. Pollard v. Criminal Ct. of Marion Cty.Indiana Supreme Court · 1975
  3. County of Los Angeles v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Stewart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. State v. RockwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API