Legal Opinion
Patenaude v. Dick's Sporting Goods Inc
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided October 18, 2019No. 9:18-cv-03151Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA BEAUFORT DIVISION Hunter J. Patenaude, ) Civil Action No. 9:18-cv-3151-RMG Plaintiff, Vv. ORDER AND OPINION Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc., and Shock Doctor, Inc., ) Defendants. eo) This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 53). For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants in part and denies in part the motion. I. Background This is a products liability case arising out an injury sustained by Plaintiff Hunter Patenaude when using a CORE Bioflex athletic cup manufactured by Defendant…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.