Legal Opinion

Davis v. Ferguson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1924No. 22655PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Redick, District Judge.

Action to recover damages for breach of a parol contract to employ plaintiff as a drayman. The petition alleges that *692on or about November 1, 1920, plaintiff and defendants entered into an oral contract whereby defendants employed plaintiff to transport milk and cream from defendants’ farm to the city of Lincoln at $5 a day, “said employment to commence on the first day of May, 1921, and continue until such time as the defendants should acquire and own their own facilities for transporting said milk and cream between the above described points and should themselves…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Security Savings Bank v. RhodesNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Meland v. YoungbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. S. Spiegal & Son v. AlpirnNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Sylvester v. Carpenter Paper Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Smith v. BaileyNebraska Supreme Court · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Touche Ross & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Maloley v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Johnson v. CurranAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Perry v. GrossNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  5. State ex rel. Davis v. Banking HouseNebraska Supreme Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API