Legal Opinion
In re the Parental Rights to B.P.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 4, 2015No. 32437-1-IIIPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
¶1 H.O. appeals the termination of her parental rights over B.P. H.O. contends substantial evidence does not support the court’s findings that (1) all necessary services were expressly and understandably offered or provided her, (2) little likelihood existed to remedy conditions so B.P. could be returned to her in the near future, (3) her continued parent-child relationship diminished B.P.’s prospects for early integration into a stable and permanent home, (4) terminating her parental rights was in B.P.’s best interests, and (5) she was unfit to parent B.P. We disagree and affirm.
*118FACTS
¶2 Soon…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Smith v. Stillwell-SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Fisher Properties, Inc. v. Arden-Mayfair, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re Welfare of ABWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Salas v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2010
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Department of Social & Health Services v. H.O.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
- In re Custody of S.M.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- In re Parental Rights to B.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
- In re Welfare of B.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2016