Department of Social & Health Services v. H.O.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGordon McCloud, J.
¶1 Petitioner H.O. asks us to reverse the Court of Appeals’ decision affirming the termination of her parental rights. She argues that the State failed to prove two prerequisites to termination, one statutory and one constitutional. The statutory prerequisite is codified at RCW 13.34.180(1)(d); it requires the State to prove that it has offered and provided “all necessary services, reasonably available, capable of correcting the parental deficiencies within the foreseeable future.” The constitutional prerequisite is a finding (express or implied) of parental unfitness. We agree with H.O. that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re Welfare of ABWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Salas v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- In Re the Welfare of HallWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- In re the Welfare of M.R.H.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Jenkins v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- In re the Termination of: IM.- M. & Z.M. - M.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- In re Custody of S.M.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- In Re The Dependency Of L.a.n.: Cheryl Newell v. DshsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- In Re The Dependency Of N.p. Kate Daniels v. DshsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- In Re The Dependency Of R.m.r., Gerald Gotcher, App v. Dshs, RespCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.