Legal Opinion

Privette v. . Allen

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 26, 1947PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

The defendant moves to dismiss the appeal for that the plaintiff failed to serve a statement of case on appeal as required by G. S., 1-282. The motion is denied.

The motion to strike was heard by the judge. He found the facts which are incorporated in his judgment. The correctness of this judgment is the only question posed for decision, and that is presented by the exception noted. Hence no service or settlement of a ease on appeal was required. The record constitutes the case to be filed in this Court. Commissioners v. Scales, 171 N. C., 523, 88 S. E., 868; Bessemer Co. v. Hardware Co., 171…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Taylor v. . PopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Duckworth v. . DuckworthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. Board of Commissioners v. ScalesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. Cape Fear & Northern Railroad v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  5. Dunn v. Marks.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Russos v. . BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Dare County v. MaterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Reece v. ReeceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Edwards v. EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API