Legal Opinion

Mur-Ray Management Corp. v. Founders Title Co.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 28, 1991No. 1 CA-CV 89-281PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANKFORD, Judge.

Plaintiffs have appealed from a summary judgment entered by the superior court in favor of all defendants in this action, in which plaintiffs both sought a declaration of their right to a promissory note and also requested damages.

Plaintiffs have presented two central issues for review:

1) Did the trial court err in granting summary judgment in favor of defendants Jones, Hoover and Founders Title Company on the basis that plaintiffs do not have an enforceable security interest in the promissory note?

2) Did the trial court err in granting summary judgment in favor of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Arizona Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. O'Malley Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  2. St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center v. Reserve Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. United Bank of Arizona v. AllynCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  4. Stratton v. Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  5. State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Challenge, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Surowiec v. Capital Title Agency, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2011
  2. KB Home Tucson, Inc. v. Charter Oak Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. Paradigm Insurance v. Langerman Law Offices, P.A.Arizona Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Napier v. BertramArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Friedman v. Merck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API