Legal Opinion

Foster v. Judnic

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided August 12, 2013No. Case No. 11-14853PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [54]

NANCY G. EDMUNDS, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendants Rick Snyder, Kirk T. Steudle, Victor Judnic, and Mark Steucher’s motion for summary judgment on Plaintiffs BBF Engineering Services, PC, and Bellandra Foster’s first amended complaint. Plaintiffs allege that the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT), through Judnic and Steucher, discriminated against her, in violation of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1981, based on Plaintiff Foster’s gender and race, by not awarding BBF various consulting contracts. Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Engquist v. Oregon Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. David Moon a/k/a Azelie Delaina Moon v. Matthew Sissen, et al.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
  2. Speed Way Transportation, LLC v. City of GahannaDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API