Legal Opinion

Township of Royal Oak v. County of Oakland

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1934No. Calendar 37,649PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEdward M. Sharpe, J.

This is an appeal in the nature of certiorari. The facts are not in dispute. Prior to the institution of this action a previous mandamus action had been had in Oakland county by the same plaintiffs against the then treasurer of Oakland county, and on September 12, 1932, a writ of mandamus was granted directing the said treasurer of Oakland county to pay forthwith to the township and its treasurer the sum of $71,787.63. Later this sum was reduced by payments until at the beginning* of the present action the amount unpaid, with interest, was the sum of $68,709.11. No appeal was taken from the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Bryant v. HolladayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Bernhard v. WallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. State v. SparrowMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. People ex rel. Attorney General v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Lighton v. . City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API