Township of Royal Oak v. County of Oakland
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEdward M. Sharpe, J.
This is an appeal in the nature of certiorari. The facts are not in dispute. Prior to the institution of this action a previous mandamus action had been had in Oakland county by the same plaintiffs against the then treasurer of Oakland county, and on September 12, 1932, a writ of mandamus was granted directing the said treasurer of Oakland county to pay forthwith to the township and its treasurer the sum of $71,787.63. Later this sum was reduced by payments until at the beginning* of the present action the amount unpaid, with interest, was the sum of $68,709.11. No appeal was taken from the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People ex rel. Bryant v. HolladayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Bernhard v. WallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. SparrowMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- People ex rel. Attorney General v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Lighton v. . City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941