Legal Opinion

Dezsofi v. Jacoby

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1942PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.

Motion under rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice to strike out the first, second, third and fourth separate tinct defenses in the answer contained in paragraphs 4 through *85213 inclusive, on the ground that it appears on the face of saM defenses, consisting of new matter, that they are insufficient in law, or in the alternative for an order pursuant to rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice striking out' paragraphs 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 of the answer on the ground that the allegations contained in said paragraphs are irrelevant, unnecessary and scandalous, or in the alternative for an order…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brown v. J. P. Morgan & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Coules v. PharrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Majlinger v. Cassino Contracting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Allied-General Nuclear ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
  3. Gates v. Rivers Construction Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Kiyoichi Fujikawa v. Sunrise Soda Water Works Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  5. MacOn County Greyhound Park, Inc. v. KnowlesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API