Paramount Pictures, Inc. v. Sparling
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.
Four actions for declaratory relief were consolidated for trial and from the four declaratory judgments which followed appeals are prosecuted by the Attorney General of the United States, plaintiff in intervention in each action (hereinafter called intervener), and the Superintendent of Banks of the State of California, defendant. The four actions present common questions of law on facts in all material respects similar and it will suffice to state the facts in the action in which Paramount Pictures, Inc. (hereinafter called Paramount), is plaintiff and respondent.
Arising out of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cameron-Hawn Realty Co. v. . City of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- The HarrimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Klauber v. San Diego St.-Car Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
- Richards & Co. v. WreschnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Kiyoichi Fujikawa v. Sunrise Soda Water Works Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Honda v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hensler v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Oosten v. Hay Haulers Dairy Employees & Helpers UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Escobedo v. Travelers InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- George T. Aratani v. Robert F. Kennedy, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.