Legal Opinion

Logan v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 19, 2002No. AC 21596PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The petitioner, Charles Logan, appeals from the habeas court’s denial of his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the habeas court improperly concluded that *374he failed to prove his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.

The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our disposition of this appeal. The petitioner was charged with the crimes of murder, conspiracy to commit murder, with three counts of assault in the first degree and with violation of probation in connection with…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Bunkley v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. Constantopoulos v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Logan v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  2. Doehrer v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  3. McClean v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  4. Logan v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API