Legal Opinion

Constantopoulos v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 3, 1998No. AC 16293PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCHALLER, J.

The petitioner appeals from the judgment of the habeas court dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus in which he alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel. After reviewing the record and briefs and hearing from the parties at oral argument, we conclude that the petitioner has failed to prove his claim.

The habeas court’s dismissal of the petitioner’s petition was predicated on a review of the petitioner’s claims that his attorney failed (1) to ensure that the petitioner’s guilty plea was voluntary, and (2) to assist the petitioner effectively in connection…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Copas v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  5. Levine v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Holley v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  2. Daniel v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  3. Smith v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  4. Dawson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  5. Logan v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API