Linneman v. Estate of Moross
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Brevoort, J.) Appeal from the disallowance of a claim against the estate of a deceased person. Defendant brings error. Reversed, and no new trial granted. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This claim is for the payment of $10 per month from October 15, 1874, to April 16, 1890. It *179involves a contingent claim for a like amount, monthly, so long as claimant lives. The commissioners on claims rejected it. Claimant appealed to the circuit court, and succeeded. The estate brings error.
The claimant and deceased were brother and sister, children of Antoine Moross. The claim is based upon a contract alleged to have been made in 1871 between Antoine and Joseph for the benefit of the claimant. Some time prior to 1871, Antoine Moross made a will, in which he gave Nancy, for life, 20 acres…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pipp v. ReynoldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Osborn v. OsbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by12 opinions
- Beeson v. GreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Portland Cremation Ass'n v. COMMISSIONER, INTERNAL REVENUECourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
- Brown v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- Palmer v. BrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Peoples Savings Bank v. GeistertMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.