Legal Opinion

Osborn v. Osborn

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1877PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to St. Clair Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

Cooley, Ch. J:

In this case the plaintiff was creditor of the firm of Osborn, Forsyth & Co., composed of the defendants Osborn and Dole and James Forsyth, and held their notes for the debt. Forsyth sold out to John R. Taylor, who by written agreement undertook to assume Forsyth’s share of the partnership liabilities. The business was afterwards continued by Osborn, Dole and Taylor for about a year, when the partnership was dissolved by consent. During the time the new partnership continued, interest was paid by it to the plaintiff on her claim, and the payments were entered on the partnership…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pipp v. ReynoldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Turner v. McCartyMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Halsted v. FrancisMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Moore v. FooteMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hawaii Builders Supply Co. v. KanetaHawaii Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Turner v. Lansing TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Linneman v. Estate of MorossMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Erdman v. Trustees of the Eutaw Methodist Protestant ChurchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
  5. Peoples Savings Bank v. GeistertMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API