Legal Opinion

Portland Cremation Ass'n v. COMMISSIONER, INTERNAL REVENUE

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 4, 1929No. 5661PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

Three separate judgment orders were entered by the Board of Tax Appeals, and the three petitions for review have by stipulation of the parties been consolidated for consideration and decision in this court. The question presented in each case is whether or not the petitioner is entitled to exclude the amounts set aside hy it as 'a maintenance fund for the perpetual care of niches, urns, and vaults sold by it from the return of its gross funds for the four years in question here, on the ground, either that they were trust funds, or were deductions allowable…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Des Moines Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Chicago & C. Ry. v. DES MOINES & C. RYSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Linneman v. Estate of MorossMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Faulds v. DillonMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Spring Canyon Coal Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  2. Broadcast Measurement Bureau, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
  3. Angelus Funeral Home v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1967
  4. Angelus Funeral Home v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  5. Johnson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API