Legal Opinion

State v. Sanchez

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 2006No. 2005-1034PublishedCited by 121 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.

{¶ 1} In this case, accepted on a discretionary appeal, we consider whether R.C. 2945.71(E), Ohio’s speedy-trial triple-count provision, is affected by an immigration detainer and whether a defense motion in limine extends time pursuant to R.C. 2945.72(E).

Case Procedure

{¶ 2} Appellee, Belia Larios Sanchez,1 a noncitizen, was arrested on December 17, 2003, as a result of a traffic stop. After a drug dog alerted to the SUV in which she was a passenger, state troopers discovered approximately $500,000 in a hollowed-out back seat. She and her two companions were charged with two felonies: money…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Carchman v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. MacDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. MyersOhio Supreme Court · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by121 opinions

  1. State v. PalmerOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. PilgrimOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. State v. WellsOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. State v. Dunbar, 87317 (6-28-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State v. VirostekOhio Court of Appeals · 2022

116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API