Legal Opinion

United States v. Hansen

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 3, 1963No. Nos. 17113-17115PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN OOSTERHOUT, Circuit Judge.

United States of America has appealed from judgments entered against it upon three complaints filed in three actions wherein it sought damages for conversion of hogs and corn subject to a valid chattel mortgage running to Farmers Home Administration of the Department of Agriculture (FHA). Defendants had purchased com and hogs from the mortgagor. The defense urged in each case is that the FHA had waived its mortgage lien as to the property sold by consenting to the sale. These three cases involve common questions of law and fact. They were consolidated and tried…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. E. H. Kramel and Orr Crum, Individually, and Bowles Livestock Commission CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
  2. Livingston v. StevensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  3. Hoyt v. ClemansSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  4. Producers Livestock Marketing Ass'n v. John Morrell & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  5. United States v. HansenDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1962

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Walter A. Hext, Sr., Harlingen Compress CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  2. The First National Bank and Trust Company of Oklahoma City, Plaintiff v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  3. Lisbon Bank and Trust Company v. MurraySupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  4. Western Idaho Production Credit Ass'n v. Simplot Feed Lots, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
  5. United States v. E. W. Savage & Son, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API