State v. Summrell
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
In the cases charging resisting arrest and assault on an officer, the defendant assigns as error the court’s denial of *6his motions to require the solicitor to elect, to quash the warrants, and to arrest the judgments. The defendant’s motion made before the introduction of any evidence to require the solicitor to elect whether he would prosecute the defendant on the charge of resisting arrest or assault on an officer was properly denied. State v. Stephens, 170 N.C. 745, 87 S.E. 131 (1915) ; State v. Smith, 201 N.C. 494, 160 S.E. 577 (1931) ; State v. Hall, 214 N.C. 639, 200 S.E.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. PetrilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- State v. SparrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- In Re BurrusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. KirbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980