Legal Opinion

Mast v. Lancaster County

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 26, 1932No. Appeal, 210PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Defendant appeals from the refusal of a new trial in an action for damages for land taken in connection with the relocation of a state highway in Salisbury Township, Lancaster County.

The jury returned a verdict in writing as follows: “And now, to wit, November 24, 1931, we, the jurors empaneled in the above case, find in favor of Levi K. Mast $2,300.00 twenty-three hundred dollars and against with interest from July 22, 1929, $323.72,” using a printed form sent out with them by the court. The trial judge, who had in his charge instructed that, if a verdict was found for plaintiff,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rottmund v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  2. Lackawanna Iron & Steel Co. v. Lackawanna & Wyoming Valley R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Thompson v. Emerald Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Parks v. BishopSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. United States v. 20.08 Acres of LandDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Hay v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County1980
  4. Gravity Fill Service Station, Inc. v. Turnpike Commission, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API