Parks v. Bishop
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
R. Bruce Parks and Charles Eberle each, separately, sued J. H. Bishop to recover damages for personal injuries. Counsel of record entered into a stipulation that “the two......actions [shall] be tried at the same time, since both are the outgrowth of the same transaction”; and they were so tried. The jury rendered a sealed verdict which reads: “We find for the defendant in this case, Mr. Bishop.” After a colloquy between the foreman of the jury and the presiding judge, this verdict was entered separately, on the record of each case, as a finding for defendant. Motions to amend the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mosier v. WolvertonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
3Cited by7 opinions
- Shively v. McDonnellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Palmer v. MosesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Paramount Paper Products Co. v. LynchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Mast v. Lancaster CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- United States v. 20.08 Acres of LandDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.