Legal Opinion

H. L. Coble Construction Co. v. Housing Authority

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 6, 1956No. 667PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The complaint, which has attached to it the contract between the parties and other exhibits, and the answer are made a part of plaintiff’s verified motion under G.S. 8-89 for an inspection of books, papers and documents in defendant’s possession, or under its control. The defendant filed no answer to the motion.

The verified motion alleges in substance these facts: The plaintiff, in the performance of its contract with the defendant to build for it 240 housing units, constructed in strict compliance with the contract’s plans and specifications certain concrete floor slabs, which settled…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Star Manufacturing Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Abbitt v. . GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Bell v. Murchison National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. Dunlap v. London Guaranty & Accident Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Evans v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burke County Public Schools Board of Education v. Juno Construction Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Tillis v. Calvine Cotton Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. BURKE CTY. PUBLIC SCH., ETC. v. Juno Const.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API