Miller v. Oglethorpe University
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Certiorari; from Fulton superior court—Judge Ellis. January 22, 1919.
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, J.
1. While as a general rule a promise tq donate money to a charitable purpose is gratuitous and unenforceable unless some consideration therefore exists, a consideration for such a promise is supplied where the promisee, during the life of the promisor and before a withdrawal of the promise and in reliance thereon, expends money and incurs enforceable liabilities in furtherance of the contemplated enterprise, or if such a promise be a mutual subscription for a common object, the promise of the others is a good consideration for the promise of each. Civil Code (1910), § 4246; Wilson v. First…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hyer v. Holmes & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
- Red Cypress Lumber Co. v. PerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. EstillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Wilson v. First Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
- Owenby v. Georgia Baptist AssemblySupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
3Cited by6 opinions
- Glass v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Brooke v. KennedySupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Willingham v. BentonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
- Kennedy v. BrookeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Mansor v. OpelinskyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.