Legal Opinion

Miller v. Oglethorpe University

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 6, 1919No. 10361PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Certiorari; from Fulton superior court—Judge Ellis. January 22, 1919.

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, J.

1. While as a general rule a promise tq donate money to a charitable purpose is gratuitous and unenforceable unless some consideration therefore exists, a consideration for such a promise is supplied where the promisee, during the life of the promisor and before a withdrawal of the promise and in reliance thereon, expends money and incurs enforceable liabilities in furtherance of the contemplated enterprise, or if such a promise be a mutual subscription for a common object, the promise of the others is a good consideration for the promise of each. Civil Code (1910), § 4246; Wilson v. First…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hyer v. Holmes & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  2. Red Cypress Lumber Co. v. PerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. EstillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  4. Wilson v. First Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
  5. Owenby v. Georgia Baptist AssemblySupreme Court of Georgia · 1912

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Glass v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  2. Brooke v. KennedySupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  3. Willingham v. BentonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
  4. Kennedy v. BrookeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  5. Mansor v. OpelinskyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API