Brooke v. Kennedy
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.
The main objection offered by plaintiffs in error by demurrer to the petition was that the contract of May 12, 1924, was illegal, and provided that certain funds as therein described should be utilized for the benefit of such organizers, to which *463sums they were not entitled. The plaintiffs in error are in the position of having signed this agreement, and, after the failure of the corporation, of pleading the illegality of the alleged contract, and its violation of public policy. It is true that an illegal contract will not be enforced by the courts, and where the contract has been executed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. EstillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- National Bank v. AmossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
- National Bank of Union Point v. AmossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
- Miller v. Oglethorpe UniversityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
- Roney v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fine v. Sovereign BankDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Cohen v. Morgan Schiff & Co. (In Re Friedman's Inc.)District Court, S.D. Georgia · 2008
- Kennedy v. BrookeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933