Legal Opinion

State v. Taylor

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided November 25, 1998No. 18681PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FLORES, Judge.

{1} The State appeals from the trial court’s order granting Defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. Defendant argued, and the trial court agreed, that Defendant’s federal and state constitutional right to be free from unlawful searches was violated when, during an investigatory stop, a second officer approached Defendant and began questioning him without reasonable suspicion. Although we agree with the State that the trial court erred in concluding that the second officer was required to have independent reasonable suspicion before approaching and questioning Defendant,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. Jose Luis Guzman and Sonia Cruz-LazoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  5. United States v. Carlos Botero-OspinaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. State v. JAVIER M.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. LeyvaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. HubbleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. VandenbergNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. DuranNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API